08443573311

I can wholeheartedly say that TAPA is nothing short of a swindle. Best to steer clear!

Just thought I’d chime in with my two cents! I’ve come across some rather unpleasant comments on this thread regarding TAPA, and it really got my goat! I signed up with them back in June, and I can confidently say that the incessant calls to both my office and mobile have ceased entirely. TAPA has truly performed exceptionally well, and I’d like to encourage any businesses out there struggling with pesky advertising calls to give TAPA a try. They’ll take care of those bothersome interruptions for you!

I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

We jumped on board with TAPA last year, and I must say, they've exceeded my expectations. The nuisance calls have dwindled to almost nothing, and that’s including the three invoices we received from some charity organisations, which were promptly cancelled as soon as we opted out through TAPA. I'm not quite sure what the other comments are all about, as my experience has been very positive with them-they're a reputable company, in my view.

It's quite baffling, isn’t it? They assist you in reclaiming those funds you might've lost to some dodgy scam, and their fees are just a drop in the ocean! I'm left scratching my head, really - where’s the catch? I’ve observed that the ASA has given a thumbs up regarding the website's compliance, and that ruling seems quite outdated. Doesn’t it strike you as odd that numerous reputable brands have found themselves on the receiving end of ASA rulings too? Are all these businesses really up to no good? At the end of the day, it's quite straightforward - just have a gander at their website. If their services align with your needs, fantastic! If they don’t, then simply pass on by. It's really that easy, innit?

I'm really baffled as to what these folks can do to assist with recovering your funds if they're not operating within the bounds of the law! They lack any legal authority and aren't qualified solicitors, so I'm scratching my head over what sets them apart from ordinary citizens like you and me. Sure, they might offer some guidance, but so can Action Fraud or the Citizens Advice Bureau, and that comes at no cost! I'd love to hear more about what exactly their role is in this process, if anyone could clarify. Cheers!

Good evening, everyone! It’s brilliant to see you all taking action against those pesky telemarketers! I wouldn’t be surprised if it was those cheeky Mancunians and Scousers causing the bother! I had a right nightmare myself until March this year when I finally enlisted the help of TAPA ARMY! Has anyone else had a run-in with a firm from Liverpool named Independent Publications? They were the dodgy sorts who were flinging my details around like confetti to all the Scousers and those dodgy Mancs! Just curious if they’ve caused any grief for any of you as well!

It seems you've fallen victim to some unsavoury characters. Just hang tight for a few days, and make sure you keep an eye on your bank account daily. You wouldn’t want any unexpected surprises!

I've been a customer of Tapa for two years and am now venturing into my third. However, they claimed they couldn't reach me, and as a result, they've withdrawn an entire year's fee from my card without my consent. This all came to light after they sent an invoice for monthly charges via email. Now, I'm in the unfortunate position of having to seek legal counsel to recover my funds.

TAPA provides absolutely no complimentary services. Exercise caution, as they lack any legal authority.

What’s happened to the other website? It's obvious that TAPA can't be relied upon.

For anyone who’s unsure, I’ve pulled out a few snippets from TAPA’s terms and conditions that might clarify things: 5. The Service Provider pledges to take appropriate steps to ensure that any unsolicited sales calls, market research inquiries, or silent and recorded messages originating from UK telemarketers are made unlawfully within 30 days from the start date of the Agreement. They plan to accomplish this by adding the Client’s details onto the various public opt-out lists available in the UK. Furthermore, the Service Provider commits to handling any lawful registrations required for the Client on an annual basis, where applicable, for the duration of this Agreement. In essence, their main action seems to be signing you up for TPS and Silentguard, both of which are entirely free resources. 35. It's worth noting that the Service Provider is not a legal entity, nor do they operate in any legal capacity or possess legal qualifications. They are simply an independent profit-driven business. They do not engage in contractual agreements or receive any form of licensing from government bodies to conduct their regular operations. Additionally, they have no affiliation or partnership with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Office of Communications (Ofcom), or the Telephone Preference Service (TPS). They lack any form of legal power and cannot recover funds on your behalf. 37. The Client must acknowledge that they cannot hold the Service Provider liable if they continue to receive unsolicited calls for sales or market research. The Service Provider takes no responsibility for such instances and cannot provide guarantees that unwanted calls will not be made by unregulated or unprofessional telemarketers from time to time. Nevertheless, the Service Provider will strive to curb any further unsolicited communications once they are informed by the Client. So really, it seems they’re just pocketing your fees to handle a process you could very well manage yourself at no cost.

Isn’t it amusing how the previous comments rave about Mr S? It makes one wonder why his ex-flame, a former coworker, and a random passerby would all feel the urge to leave a note here. Hilarious, isn’t it? Looks like Mr S has far too much spare time on his hands! What a pity, really. The truth is, he’s strapped for cash, lacks genuine mates, and has a track record that isn’t exactly commendable-rumours even suggest he’s prone to violence against women and spends far too much time online, trying to inflate his own ego. Thankfully, he’s also devoid of any offspring-what a relief for society! Just picture this charity scammer, a rather unpleasant character with an inflated sense of self, trying to propagate his dubious lineage. Quite a horrifying thought, I must say! The silver lining is that the unfortunate souls who end up dating this repugnant creature usually see the reality of who he is very quickly and make a swift exit before it spirals further into chaos.

Curious to know, I've read that the Advertising Standards Authority claims it’s quite the scam.

The Advertising Standards Authority has made a significant decision regarding the Advertising Protection Agency. You can read more about their adjudication by visiting their official site at www.asa.org.uk/ASA-action/Adjudications/2012/1/The-Advertising-Protection-Agency/SHP_ADJ_172523.aspx.

I've had a similar experience where my details were being circulated without my consent. It appears several businesses down my street faced the same ordeal. The Trade Association for Personal Privacy (TAPA) looked into the matter and discovered that a company named Empire based in Manchester was behind it all. They subsequently forwarded all their findings to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), who then took charge of the situation. Thank goodness those incessant calls to my shop ceased, as I often find myself alone and customers were leaving in frustration while I dealt with these relentless phone calls from a Manchester charity publishing firm. On a side note, I never had issues with Independent Publications; I understand they operate out of Liverpool. The problem was firmly linked to the Manchester network. Fortunately, the calls stopped altogether in early June, and I’ve enjoyed a peaceful atmosphere since. Let’s hope this nightmare doesn’t rear its ugly head again!

Absolutely appalling! Some lowlifes have managed to get hold of my girlfriend's credit card and drained £380 from her account. It's heartbreaking to think about how much this has affected our whole family; we're really feeling the pinch. We've reached out to the Citizens Advice Bureau, and they've confirmed that this is a blatant act of theft. The police are now on the case, trying to track these criminals down. Fingers crossed justice is served soon!

I signed up with TAPA a fortnight ago after stumbling across this forum and couldn't resist sharing my gratitude for all the guidance. The nuisance calls have significantly reduced already, and TAPA is working diligently with some publishing companies to reverse the charges they’ve sent my way. They’ve dedicated quite a bit of time to my situation, and I’m absolutely chuffed with the outcome. Cheers to everyone for the help!

**ASA Ruling on The Advertising Protection Agency** **The Advertising Protection Agency** 27 Old Gloucester Street London WC1N 3AX Date: 25 January 2012 Media: Internet (on own site) Sector: Business Complaints lodged: 4 Complaint Reference: A11-172523 **Advertisement Details** The claims presented on the website, www.advertisingprotectionagency.org, which was viewed in September 2011, prominently displayed the company logo, an encircled tick, along with the phrase "Registered Data Controller No. Z1214518." The home page included various tabs on the left offering additional details. The main page contained the proclamation: "TAPA assists with Nuisance Calls & Junk Faxes ... The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 is a UK statute which dictates that all organisations, including charities, voluntary entities, and political factions, must not conduct sales or marketing calls to telephone numbers unless they've obtained the owner's explicit consent." Further elaboration on this regulation was provided. The text continued: "The Advertising Protection Agency (TAPA) works to thwart unsolicited advertising and marketing sales tactics targeted at consumers and businesses opting out of such unsolicited outreach via telephone, fax, and email. Whether individuals wish to halt a single call or all unsolicited approaches, TAPA strives to ensure these marketing contacts cease permanently." A link labelled "STOP NUISANCE CALLS" was available. At the bottom, a note read: "Explore the links below for terms and conditions." The logo of the Telephone Preference Service was also featured alongside the assertion, "TAPA is an Associate Licensee of the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) and has shown dedication to enhancing the standards and effectiveness of the direct marketing sector." A click-through link designated "Stop Nuisance Calls" directed users to a distinct page labelled "Stop Nuisance Sales Calls, Market Research, Silent and Recorded Message Calls To Your Phone Number" which included information on that specific service. At the bottom of this second page, the text stated, "For more details, please refer to our Terms of Service regarding a registration fee of just £2.25 a month for up to five numbers." A link below prompted, "Register Now." On the Terms of Service page, under "STOP NUISANCE CALLS," the information revealed, "The Client will incur an annual administrative fee to the Service Provider of £26.95 inc VAT upon the Agreement Date via credit/debit card payment to cover all associated costs including time, materials, utilities, postage of documentation, and any other expenses incurred by the Service Provider in processing new Client registrations for up to five telephone numbers. This fee equates to a monthly charge of £2.25 inc VAT ... An additional annual administrative fee of £9.95 inc VAT (0.83p inc VAT monthly) will be applicable upon the Agreement Date for registering any numbers above five (6+)." On the "Cancellation of Service" page, under "Nuisance Calls & Junk Faxes," the text indicated, "Should you have instructed TAPA to halt sales calls or junk faxes to your number(s), you may cancel these services within 7 days of your instruction to TAPA ..." **Complaints Received** The ASA acknowledged receipt of four complaints: 1. Three complainants contested that the website suggested TAPA held an official status. 2. Three other complainants, who had signed up with TAPA to deter nuisance calls, questioned whether it was adequately clear that TAPA charged for its services. **Regulations Referenced** CAP Code (Edition 12) 3.13.103.33.413.9 **Response from TAPA** 1. TAPA maintained that they'd sought counsel from the ASA regarding the content on their website and believed it complied with advertising standards. They indicated that since commencing operations with businesses in 2007, and with consumers in May 2011, they felt the design of their website was meant to reflect their service model and present professionalism, opting for a corporate style that wouldn’t resemble a typical retail site. They questioned whether the complainant mistakenly associated 'corporate' with 'official.' They clarified that the tick in their logo symbolised assurance, quality service, and support as consumer advocates combating unlawful telemarketing practices. TAPA elaborated on their collaborations with various Trading Standards bodies, newspapers, and police since their establishment, suggesting that these bodies had not raised similar concerns. TAPA also explained the presence of the TPS logo, noting their legitimate membership with TPS, which allows businesses to ensure compliance by screening their data correctly. They stated that the Registered Data Controller Number was necessary to show consumers how they adhered to the Data Protection Act 1998 and that the public could verify this with the ICO. TAPA’s representation of a '100% Satisfaction Guaranteed' stamp across all pages was put forth as evidence that they were indeed a commercial entity, refuting claims of being an official body. Furthermore, they pointed to the 'Cancellation of Service' link on each page, as well as testimonials and links steering users to advice from governmental regulators as indicators of their business nature. Their FAQ section also explicated their official status. 2. They argued that the complainants evidently failed to understand the necessary due diligence regarding their fees, stating that specific pricing details were available on the "Stop Nuisance Calls" page, along with a displayed VAT Registration Number across the site-suggestive that they were not a complimentary service. They highlighted the presence of the PayPal logo across their pages as a clear indication of charged services. The Terms of Service page also detailed their fees, available through multiple links for user access. A comprehensive FAQ was provided for clarity on service charges. After placing an order online, customers received a welcome pack, inclusive of billing and terms. Additionally, the seven-day cooling-off period was seen as a sign of reputable business practice. **ASA Assessment** 1. **Upheld** The ASA acknowledged that while the website didn't explicitly claim to be a government entity, the manner in which information was presented suggested an official source might provide similar services. The blend of practical consumer advice typically expected from governmental resources led to the inference of authority due to TAPA’s branding and services, thus deeming the advertisement misleading. This contravened CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1, 3.3 (Misleading Advertising) and 3.41 (Imitation and Denigration). 2. **Upheld** The ASA concurred that some consumers misinterpreted the website, believing the service to be complimentary. Although TAPA had included fees on a separate page, the absence of clear upfront communication about costs on the main page contributed to confusion. The critical charge information nestled within extensive text impeded the clear conveyance of costs, leading to a determination that TAPA did not adequately disclose their service fees, thus breaching CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1, 3.3 (Misleading Advertising) and 3.9 and 3.10 (Qualification).

Who is responsible for TAPA? Was it established by a company or a group of partners?

How much time passed before TAPA managed to assist you in getting your funds back? They initially assured me it would only take a month, yet it ended up taking close to seven weeks before my card issuer finally sorted things out. I get that it might not be entirely TAPA's fault, but I was definitely led to believe it would be quicker. Should I feel a bit miffed about this situation?

It seems that a few of the staff from Abingdon Homes are actually involved with TAPA, which might explain their absence from TAPA's rather questionable directory!

I can assure you, TAPA are absolutely legitimate. They stood by me in court when I faced off against BCS Multimedia and emerged victorious. BCS attempted to claim over £1300 from me. It was actually Trading Standards who recommended I turn to TAPA for assistance. The previous remark is nothing short of a vindictive falsehood. Frankly, I think TAPA are exceptional in what they do.

I came across some details on TAPA’s own website while browsing through their FAQs, and I thought I'd share my thoughts. Can TAPA assist me in reclaiming funds that I suspect are lost due to scams from support publishing companies? Indeed, TAPA offers guidance to businesses on ways to recoup funds they’ve handed over to support publishing firms that have failed to deliver as advertised or have engaged in misleading practices-this includes situations where refunds have been denied or funds have been unlawfully deducted from one’s account. There are legal avenues available for recovering money even if a company has ceased operations or entered liquidation, as per various legislative measures and banking protocols. What's more, there are no extra charges for this service, and TAPA compiles this information into a detailed guide tailored for any business that reaches out to them. However, it seems that TAPA merely provides advice on potential recovery methods. They don’t actually perform any recovery actions themselves, as they clarify in section 35 of their service terms. 35. The Service Provider is not a legal entity and does not operate in any legal capacity nor are they legally qualified. I think that sums it up clearly enough!

TAPA IS A CON, DO NOT HAND OVER ANY CASH - READ THIS FIRST Since I initially blew the whistle on these charlatans in my prior post, they've persisted in their fraudulent activities, all while attempting to tarnish the reputations of innocent businesses. They’re misleading well-meaning individuals into believing they have fallen victim to scams. TPS, data protection, and racketeering cons have been rife for ages! ANTHONY MICHAEL SIMISTER and his gang, ANTHONY MICHAEL SIMISTER is a disqualified director, which is precisely why TAPA isn't a limited company; if it were, he’d have been ousted long ago. Do your own digging. Name: ANTHONY MICHAEL SIMISTER Address: HIGHFIELD HOUSE, CONGLETON ROAD SCHOLAR GREEN STOKE ON TRENT Postcode: Date of Birth: 23/09/1980 Nationality: BRITISH Number of Disqualification Orders: 1 Disqualified From: 22/03/2006 To: 21/03/2015 Company No.: Reason: CDDA 1986 S8 Here's the link if you're still sceptical about this firm!!!!! wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/5924eb2ebed ... ers_apps?row=18 You’ve been duped, believe me, STOP GIVING MONEY TO TAPA, YOU'RE JUST FUELING MORE SCAMS!! Now, if you’re curious about why he's banned, I’ve previously pointed out that Anthony remains deeply entrenched in charity advertising scams. He operates at the lowest possible level of depravity. ANTHONY AND HIS SLY BUNCH OF ASSOCIATE SCHEMERS APPROACH BUSINESS FOR SUPPORT FOR CHILDREN SUFFERING FROM LEUKAEMIA AND CANCER VICTIMS, (HOW DISGUSTING!). YET THE FUNDS RAISED NEVER REACH THE CHARITIES BECAUSE THE “OVERHEAD COSTS ATE UP ALL THE PROFITS.” MANY OF THESE COMPANIES ARE DISSOLVED TO EVADE TAXES AND CHARITY CONTRIBUTIONS. THIS IS WHAT LED TO ANTHONY'S DISQUALIFICATION WHILE MANAGING HIS COMPANY, Supporting Link Alliance Ltd, which he later rebranded as THE SUPPORTING LINK LTD, company number 04070245. Don’t believe me? Still in disbelief? Verify it for yourself; here’s a handy link to the court case that spills all the details... high-court-justice.vlex.co.uk/vid/-52636657. And here’s a link to Supporting Link Ltd at Companies House, wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/6a89511d7db ... df8/compdetails As I mentioned in my earlier post, Mr Simister is also involved with numerous charity advertising firms. If you get suckered into paying TAPA, Anthony will notify other affiliated agencies to cease contacting you. But if you don't pay, he’ll unleash them on you relentlessly. Mr Anthony Michael Simister (click the link below to delve deeper) holds 6 director or secretary positions. company-director-check.co.uk/director/906735324 The DOB listed at Companies House matches: 23/09/1980 Director Address: 1 Barratt Gardens Middleton Manchester M24 5JU (This isn’t his actual home address; it’s a business front) THE CARING FRIENDS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED No 04311609 OFFICERS: Ms Natalie Jane Selby (CLICK TO LEARN MORE ABOUT JANE) company-director-check.co.uk/director/908255175 JCAS COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED No. 04094831 OFFICERS: Mr James Cooney (CLICK TO DISCOVER MORE ABOUT JAMES) company-director-check.co.uk/director/907302050 THE SUPPORTING LINK LTD No. 04070245 Ms Natalie Jane Selby (CLICK TO LEARN MORE ABOUT JANE) company-director-check.co.uk/director/908255175 HELP AT HAND (UK) LIMITED NO. 04751838 OFFICERS: Mr Wayne Chadwick (CLICK TO DISCOVER MORE ABOUT WAYNE) company-director-check.co.uk/director/909814783 THE HELPING HAND PARTNERSHIP LIMITED No 03882737 OFFICERS: Mr Darran Gerrard Fogartaig (CLICK HERE TO LEARN ABOUT DARREN) VERY INTRIGUING company-director-check.co.uk/director/907763047 OFFICERS: Ms Elaine Ruth Varley (CLICK TO DISCOVER MORE ABOUT ELAINE) company-director-check.co.uk/director/907820060 A 2 MEDIA SOLUTIONS LTD No. 05687588 OFFICERS: Ms Natalie Jane Selby (CLICK TO DISCOVER MORE ABOUT WAYNE) company-director-check.co.uk/director/908255175 Links to the companies mentioned above: company-director-check.co.uk/director/906735324 company-director-check.co.uk/director/911028926 Still doubt what I’m saying? Surely, you’re coming around to the truth? I’ve no love lost for TAPA, but the evidence is crystal clear. Check the companies for yourself using the links I’ve provided. Oh, and most of the aforementioned companies have registered their offices above a café in Manchester, which is merely a postal address! MARSDEN GIBSON & COMPANY 102 STAND LANE RADCLIFFE, MANCHESTER M26 1JU Does that sound familiar? (this is the registered address for “peter marsden”, where the TAPA website originates as pointed out in my first post here) Now let’s take a look at the shady associates of Mr Anthony Simister, starting with the delightful Ms Natalie Jane Selby (another rogue) who is implicated in the CHILDREN STRUGGLING WITH LEUKAEMIA AND CANCER SCAM. Ms Selby also manages numerous advertising companies. DIRECT ACTION (UK) LTD Dissolved THE CARING FRIENDS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Dissolved Officers: Mr Anthony Michael Simister (click below to see more) company-director-check.co.uk/director/906735324 THE SUPPORTING LINK LTD Dissolved Officers: Mr Anthony Michael Simister (click name to see more) company-director-check.co.uk/director/906735324 UK TRADE PUBLICATIONS LTD Dissolved HELP AT HAND (UK) LIMITED In Liquidation Officers: Mr Wayne Chadwick (click name to see more) company-director-check.co.uk/director/909814783 And as previously mentioned company-director-check.co.uk/director/911028927 (go ahead, have a look yourself) Mr James Cooney (CLICK BELOW TO DISCOVER MORE) DOB 14/09/1979 was a director at JCAS Communications with Mr Simister-no other directors but if anyone feels inclined to dig deeper, please do, as it’s my hunch that these associates are linked to other advertising firms as well. Have a glance at the shareholders. company-director-check.co.uk/director/907302050 Mr Wayne Chadwick (click name for details) DOB 24/02/1973 shared a director position with Mr Simister at Help at Hand UK Ltd, which is particularly noteworthy. company-director-check.co.uk/director/909814783 CENTREPOINT NATIONWIDE LTD INSTANT ACCESS (UK) LTD HELP AT HAND (UK) LIMITED DATA PROTECTION UK LIMITED (THE OLD DATA PROTECTION SCAM, WHAT A SHOCK!) Officers: Mr Victor Jordan Librae (click below for more) company-director-check.co.uk/director/908938664 Oh, and Wayne Chadwick is also a Banned Director, presumably due to his involvement in the data protection scam. wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/b88d59ea365 ... ers_apps?row=18 Other officials at Data Protection UK Ltd-NOW THIS IS WHERE IT GETS JUICY-include Mr Victor Jordan Librae, DOB 31/12/1981; check this chap out and investigate the companies he’s associated with, and you’ll find a web of advertising and marketing enterprises, likely tangled with TAPA. They’re hiding behind a holding company as many of them are disqualified directors. company-director-check.co.uk/director/908938664 And let’s investigate Mr Darran Gerrard Fogartaig, born 25/01/1961 (click below for details)-he was a director with Mr Simister at THE HELPING HAND PARTNERSHIP; here are some of his ventures: company-director-check.co.uk/director/907763047 PLATINUM VENTURE PROJECTS LIMITED Dissolved Officers: Ms Elaine Ruth Varley (click below for more info) company-director-check.co.uk/director/907820060 THE HELPING HAND PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Dissolved Officers: Ms Elaine Ruth Varley (click below for further details) company-director-check.co.uk/director/907820060 HANDS ON PARTNERSHIP LTD. Dissolved Officers: Mr Darren John McKeown (click below to explore) company-director-check.co.uk/director/907384465 Mr Darren John McKeown, born 01/01/1975, the companies here are indeed fascinating. company-director-check.co.uk/director/907384465 CHILDREN'S SUPPORT PUBLICATIONS LIMITED Dissolved Officers: Mr Judah Cole (click below for details) company-director-check.co.uk/director/908068200 HANDS ON PARTNERSHIP LTD. Dissolved PERSONAL NUMBER CORPORATION LTD. Dissolved Officers: Mr Paul Wilson (click below for further investigation) company-director-check.co.uk/director/907384480 ABC SUPPORT PUBLICATIONS LTD. Dissolved I could continue this digging indefinitely, but if you haven’t realised that TAPA is an absolute scam or that the so-called Advertising Protection Agency is on the level of a con, what can I say? “There’s a sucker born every minute.” If any well-meaning individuals seek to uncover the shareholders of the companies listed above and can add to this information, please share it here and utilise the rest of my statement to spread awareness about this fraudster Mr Anthony Simister. The officers are just the tip of the iceberg; the shareholders might be the ones truly running the show, doubtlessly connected to other fraudulent ventures. If you’re reading this, and you’re a member of any other forum, kindly repost this or lead people to this thread. Let’s not forget that if there are innocent businesses featured on TAPA’s website (some of which might be a bit dodgy), who believe that TAPA operates as a legitimate agency, they need to Grimly reconsider and take action! Report them to Trading Standards!

I found myself rather bemused by the incessant stream of calls-between ten and fifteen a month-claiming that I had consented to support various “worthy causes” in my community through ordering advertising space in assorted publications and planners. The situation raised my eyebrows when I began receiving invoices from different firms, all for remarkably identical amounts, which set off alarm bells. Curiosity got the better of me, prompting a quick search on Google for some of these companies, and to my astonishment, I frequently stumbled upon the site for The Advertising Protection Agency. Their website seemed to be the sole beacon of clarity amongst the chaos, so I decided to reach out. I was relieved to finally converse with someone who elucidated what was happening, the reasoning behind it, and, crucially, how to put a stop to it. After an hour-long chat followed by some digging around on their website, it became abundantly clear that registering with them was the best course of action. So, I went ahead with it. It’s been nine weeks now, and I’m pleased to share that I’ve enjoyed a blissful three-week respite from those unwanted calls. At first, a couple of these unscrupulous callers left me in a state of panic with their menacing talk of doorstep collections, bailiffs, solicitors, and court actions. However, each time I faced an issue, I reached out to my appointed representative, who skillfully demystified the threats and put me at ease. TAPA genuinely know how to deal with these unscrupulous outfits. So, my straightforward advice is this: if you find yourself in a predicament similar to what I faced, do pay a visit to the TAPA website, peruse their information, and if you’re feeling uncertain about anything before signing up, don’t hesitate to give them a ring. They’ll provide the same reassurance and clarity that they did for me.

Hello, Oliver! It seems I fell victim to the Empire dodgy dealings too! They managed to squeeze two payments out of me for separate ads that they claimed I'd previously consented to-definitely not the case, mind you! The pressure they put on me was utterly overwhelming, so I caved in. Clearly, it’s some sort of swindling operation. Thankfully, TAPA managed to secure one refund for me via MBNA, and they’re currently battling to retrieve the other. It’s a relief to know you've managed to resolve your situation too!

In our view, this appears to be a guise for gathering phone numbers with the intention of selling them on to scammers who orchestrate these schemes. The website itself, coupled with its absence of connection to any governmental organisation like Ofcom, really underscores this suspicion.

I had a brief romance with Anthony, and I must say he was the epitome of a gentleman. Such a charming fellow! Quite generous, too, though he often underestimated himself. Sadly, things didn’t pan out for us; I began to suspect he was too attached, and when I started asking more of him, he eventually took the hint and moved along. I strongly feel that his main passion lies in his career, and if you dare to interfere with that or upset him during work hours, you're likely to find yourself out of favour. It’s fascinating how many people have him on their lips, even though he keeps himself to himself and avoids the limelight. He gives off this air of modesty, almost as if he is pretending to be less than he is. He’s had a tough upbringing, with the loss of his mother, yet he perseveres admirably. I often overlooked the solitary nature of his life and took his steadfastness for granted. He’s not the type to stray, despite having plenty of chances, though he can be a bit of a rogue sometimes. Nonetheless, he values his time with you. I genuinely hope to cross paths with him again soon.

We signed up with TAPA around eleven weeks back, and I must say, I’ve already observed a significant change. The calls have decreased quite a bit, and this organisation is now reaching out to the companies that have been issuing threats to us. So far, so good!

As long as you keep your registration intact and refrain from removing your information from TAPA's opt-out list, you should be fine.

I recently had a conversation with Ian from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) at the number 02074922222. He mentioned that they’ve issued a statement acknowledging a scam operation tied to the Advertising Protection Agency, located in East Cheshire. They're impersonating legitimate sources, and Ian suggested I reach out to East Cheshire Trading Standards at 0300 123 55 00 to help put an end to this fraudulent activity.

I'm currently with TAPA, and I must say, they've really managed to keep those pesky calls at bay for me. Their support has been exceptional, and I've received an abundance of counselling from them. I forwarded two invoices I received from those dodgy Manchester charity scam outfits, and they've taken it upon themselves to tell them to shove off on my behalf. It was quite maddening when I got bombarded with about six aggressive messages left on my answering machine over the course of two days, but since then, I haven't heard another peep from them. TAPA had warned me this would happen! To all the miserable souls leaving disparaging remarks about TAPA here, perhaps it's time you returned to the shadows from whence you came.

Absolutely spot on! When I decided to pull my details from the TAPA list, those pesky calls began trickling in once more. So, I thought it best to sign up again, and wouldn’t you know it, they began to disappear once again!

Crikey! It seems like there's quite the con going on here, doesn’t it? The Advertising Protection Agency, or so they style themselves, has been labelled as a bit dodgy, to say the least. According to the folks at the Advertising Standards Authority, they reckon this lot is merely masquerading under the guise of protection-almost like a shakedown, if I'm honest. It’s all a bit fishy, as it appears they might just be in cahoots with those annoying cold-callers-perhaps even the same crowd! They lure you in with promises of reducing those pesky calls for a mere tenner a week, and lo and behold, your troubles seem to vanish, but who knows where your cash actually goes? Quite the scheme, if you ask me!

I couldn't care less about the naysayers. They've managed to put a stop to the annoying sales calls pestering my wife's hair salon, and two charity organisations have dropped their incessant payment demands as well. As far as I'm concerned, I'm firmly sticking with TAPA for the long haul. It's blatantly obvious to anyone with a modicum of sense that the disparaging comments about TAPA are from phonies or disgruntled customers who’ve likely avoided their payments. Now they're just being nasty because they’re facing court action to reclaim their dues. The endless chatter about TAPA being a scam is utterly tiresome. They’ve been in the game for ages, and it's clear they would have been shut down long ago if there were any truth to the allegations. Only the dimwitted would fall for such slander. Most of those spiteful remarks are nonsensical and can only be attributed to those with very little intelligence. So do your worst, because you're not swaying my loyalty towards TAPA! Give it a rest, you silly plonkers!

Is there any chance of uncovering the identities of the individuals involved or pinpointing their exact whereabouts? We tried reaching out via phone and ended up having a rather fiery conversation, but were told that they predominantly handle inquiries through online channels.

This fellow is absolutely minted, despite his attempts to play it down. I’ve got a mate who’s in the real estate game over in Alderley Village, and they let slip that he’s a partner in one of the agencies there. I mean, what are the chances of two blokes named Anthony Simister living in such a small place? I reckon it must be the same chap. He has a way with the ladies and seems particularly smitten with slim, vivacious types. Plus, he’s really into flashy cars; you can’t miss the way he parks outside, making a right show of himself! What a cheeky numpty!

TAPA = a bunch of con merchants.

Anthony Simister is quite the tycoon, boasting an impressive portfolio of more than 70 properties scattered throughout Knutsford and Wilmslow. His grip on the local political landscape is formidable, often exerting his financial clout to sway decisions. With an estimated fortune exceeding £50 million, he has his fingers in the pies of many prominent bars and eateries in Alderley Edge, often operating through proxy directors and various pseudonyms. His sway over the policies governing Macclesfield and Cheshire East is nothing short of substantial, showcasing the breadth of his assets, many of which are cleverly registered under different names. In legal circles, he's widely recognised as Mr Cheshire and Mr Manchester, a testament to his pervasive influence.

Indeed, my friend, they provide yet another service aimed at dealing with a variety of unsolicited sales calls. This is a niche offering tailored for companies caught up in legal wrangles with charitable sponsorship entities. I must say, they’ve been utterly fantastic and rescued me from a rather dire situation. The incessant calls have ceased, and they even managed to retrieve my funds. Mission accomplished, I’d say. As for the complimentary services you mentioned, they are entirely unrelated to the court matters they successfully handled on my behalf. Seems you’ve misunderstood the whole scenario, mate.

I've noticed a significant improvement since TAPA intervened with the relentless sales calls that were bombarding my shop for what felt like an eternity-six months, to be precise. It took around two and a half weeks for the nuisance to finally subside, but now it's blissfully quiet. I used to be inundated with about seven to ten calls each week, so it's a relief! I'm baffled by the negative remarks about TAPA. From my experience, their customer service has been nothing short of stellar! I also checked the latest adjudication from the ASA, which merely mentioned that a handful of people believed TAPA's service was free. If TAPA were dodgy, they’d have been shut down long ago by the ASA-clearly, they’re operating above board!

TAPA, also known as the Advertising Protection Agency, appears to be nothing more than a scam. We've had confirmation from the press office at the Advertising Standards Authority that some folks consider this organisation a sham, essentially aligning with the very idea of a protection racket. It seems like they might be working hand-in-hand with those pesky cold-call marketers - they could even be the same individuals, for all we know! They lure you in with a promise of silence on the nuisance calls for a payment of around £10 a week, only for your money to be miraculously returned when things go silent. Quite the clever trick, isn't it?

We’re affiliated with TAPA and honestly, these folks are fantastic! We reckon some of these remarks are from chancers rather than the proper scammers themselves!

Having perused the ASA's ruling, it merely points out that a specific section of TAPA's website could benefit from a bit more clarity. There’s no mention of them facing scrutiny, being taken down, or anything untoward. The fact that the ASA scrutinised their entire site and arrived at that conclusion only reinforces TAPA's legitimacy, doesn’t it? If there were any serious concerns, the findings would surely highlight them! I’ve noticed on the ASA's site that a multitude of major companies in the UK have been subject to similar reviews. This, I believe, further solidifies TAPA's credibility as the ASA hasn’t indicated any wrongdoing.

TAPA seems to be nothing short of a con artist operation. If you’re looking to report them, I suggest ringing up East Cheshire Trading Standards on these digits: 01270685900, 01260375500, or even 08454040506. Additionally, you can unearth plenty of details regarding their dodgy practices over at whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/08443573311. According to my local Trading Standards, steering clear of these jokers is paramount; it's best not to engage with their calls or hand over any cash. Total scam!

I’m employed at Sarafina, the restaurant in Wilmslow, where Anthony hangs his hat. He claims to be merely a consultant, not the proprietor, but Gregor, who also works there, mentioned catching a glimpse of the business account with Anthony’s name prominently featured on the bank statements. So, it stands to reason that he’s actually the owner, doesn’t it? It’s a bit peculiar, as he’s always popping in and out. That said, I can’t fault him; he’s genuinely a lovely chap, always courteous and never too busy to have a chat. It baffles me though why he downplays his role when, if I were in his shoes, I’d want the whole world to know I owned a restaurant! It’s like he doesn't care at all.

TAPA has managed to retrieve more than £400 for me, which I had forked out to some advertising companies that failed to deliver on their promises. It was my local Trading Standards that pointed me towards TAPA when I was initially swindled by a firm in Manchester. I'm thoroughly impressed with their service! As for those previous comments, they seem rather dubious-I'm inclined to think they're from fake accounts. There's no way those can be authentic testimonials.

You're nothing but a downright fabricator! I'm on their records, and this is exclusively the number for incoming calls!

WATCH OUT FOR THIS NUMBER!!

I received a call claiming I owed them money, but I firmly told them I wouldn’t fall for their trickery. My documents arrived in roughly the same time frame, close to ten days. Fast forward six months, and I’ve now got a 'letter before action' saying they’ll drag me to court if I don’t cough up. Would you believe it? It turned up six days after the date noted on it, and according to their threats, they’d launch legal proceedings the very next day. Thankfully, I’m not facing this dodgy bunch all on my own!